Features of Public Health Care Policy for Medicare - myassignmenthelp

Question: Write about theFeatures of Public Health Care Policy for Medicare. Answer: The primary focus of the essay is the different health care policy and the different aspects related to it. It further contains the evidence, stakeholder advocacy and the political choice in the understanding of the public health policy. The emphasis has been laid on the policy triangle to identify the main features of the Australian government`s Medicare Benefits Schedule Review Taskforce`s preliminary report on the after-hours practitioner services. To support the argument the policy triangle model has been taken into account. It identifies the stakeholders and the process of shaping the policy. Finally, the importance of the policy and the procedure of making it better have been mentioned in the essay. By doing a detailed study of the taskforce, it has been noted that in between the years 2010-2011 and 2015-2016, there has been an increase of the number of the urgent after-hours MBS services. The services have increased unto one hundred and fifty percent. Not only this but the benefits paid also has increased by one hundred and seventy percent. In some urban areas of Australia, the use of this urgent after services has increased largely. The growth in the stopping of the urgent after-hours services comes as not be driven by the increasing clinical need for the urgent after-hour services (Glasgow, et al., 2012). It has merged with the entry of new venture into the market with the inclusion of models, which promote the services to the clients and putting the focus on the feasibility of the customers without extra cost. In many cases it has been found that there has been no clear difference between `urgent` and `non-urgent`. It has been highly confused by the medical practitioners. Th e high demand of the use of the items by MDS services merges with the continuing service of care by the patient`s regular GP and MDS services are at times offered less qualified practitioners. This funding should be made available for the after-hour services. The MBS items for the urgent after-hours attendances should not be made available where the patient has made an appointment before the commencement of the after-hours period (Kannan, Rabanal Scott, 2012). There has been efforts taken to understand the policy analysis. Many scholars and practitioners have made the effort. However, less attention has been put forward towards this. The analysis of the health policy issues is the understanding of the interactions between different institutions, interests and the ideas related to the health policy. The health policy environment is the most important thing (Treml Halpin, 2012). Certain specific characteristics of the health sector affect the environment of the policy. The state is both the provider and purchaser of the services. It can run as a partner with the private sectors. In the undertaking of the health care purchase and regulations, the state is almost heavily relies on and it lacks the essential information which can solely be provided by the sectors it is overseeing. Health issues are maximum times of high profile and it demands the attention of the public. The government also has a major role to play (Weimer Vining, 2017). The state government at times indulges in the partnership with the private health care sectors. The policy processes are changing often. It is not fixed and static. It is not constant. The government at times offers the public medical facilities, which add up to the public health care policy systems. Many problems have risen because of this. The private policy systems are costly compared to the public ones. Maximum people cannot afford the private health care sectors (Sorrentino, et al., 2012). There are many problems as well related to the approach. It is obvious that the pre-conditions will be present at the same time. The roles of the higher level of government will be adopted and the roles of the other actors are neglected. It is difficult to apply any kind of approach when there is not a single exclusive policy or any kind of agency involved. The policies keep on changing as they are being implemented. There is one effective approach, which is the bottom up approach, which implies that the people at subordinate levels have the option to change the policy and reshape it according to their convenience. The evaluation of the policy becomes quite difficult (Fainstein DeFilippis, 2015). It becomes difficult enough to separate the impact of the individuals and different levels of government on the results and effects of the policy. There is another important theory, which is known as the principal-agent theory. According to this theory in each situation, there is certain re lationship between the people who define the policy and the people who takes part in the implementation of the policy (Jenkins, et al., 2016). The principal-agent relationship of the policy depends upon the nature of the problems related to the policy. it further includes the scale of the chain required, it also includes the full size of the groups which is being affected. It also includes the positive sensitivity. The formal and informal agencies are taken into account (Turner, 2014). Thus from the above essay it can be concluded that certain health policies needs the political attention. Though politics acts as the decision maker in the formulation of the policy in any nation, the nation needs to pay attention to the formulation of the policies. It should aim at creating a nation free from the health issues. The implementation of the policies should be able to address the obstacles that are addressed due to the failure of the approaches. It should completely focus on the formulation of the policy for the betterment of the nation. it must identify the roles of all the stakeholders including the government and the heads of the private health care sectors. The evidence-based policy should be formed. All the actors in the system must function effectively. The role of all the actors must be analyzed completely as they have an important part to play in the process. It must make sense of how few health issues merged into the government policy agenda. References Fainstein, S. S., DeFilippis, J. (Eds.). (2015).Readings in planning theory. John Wiley Sons. Glasgow, R. E., Green, L. W., Taylor, M. V., Stange, K. C. (2012). An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice.American journal of preventive medicine,42(6), 646-654. Jenkins, T. J., Mai, H. T., Burgmeier, R. J., Savage, J. W., Patel, A. A., Hsu, W. K. (2016). The triangle model of congenital cervical stenosis.Spine,41(5), E242-E247. Kannan, P., Rabanal, P., Scott, A. M. (2012). Monetary and macroprudential policy rules in a model with house price booms.The BE Journal of Macroeconomics,12(1). Sorrentino, N., Menniti, D., Esposito, L., Gallina, G. (2012, September). A model to compare supergrid projects using EU policy triangle. InEnergy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON), 2012 IEEE International(pp. 738-742). IEEE. Treml, E. A., Halpin, P. N. (2012). Marine population connectivity identifies ecological neighbors for conservation planning in the Coral Triangle.Conservation Letters,5(6), 441-449. Turner, P. (2014). The global long-term interest rate, financial risks and policy choices in EMEs. Weimer, D. L., Vining, A. R. (2017).Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Taylor Francis.